Zenwalk 2.6 - Comments
Saturday 24th June 2006
Categories: Reviews, GNU/Linux, FLOSS
- Submit
- 1 - 3
All comments not written by free-bees.co.uk are owned by the author, and free-bees.co.uk is in no way responsible for their content.
2. Submitted by Anonymous, Tuesday 27th June 2006
My experience with Zenwalk is that it is simply a 686 optimized Slackware 10.2 with a slighty different installer in that it asks you to add users before reboot. Slackware is 486 capable out of the box. Zenwalk is really for slackers who want 686 optimized distribution. Hence very tight security settings for network, access to cdrom drives, etc. It remains very close to a 'do it yourself' distro, and delivers on the fundamental of slackware's KISS (e.g. keep it simple stupid). I think once you read this your own experience with Zenwalk will make some more sense to you. I also think it would have been nice for you to mention that Zenwalk is based upon slackware, one of our oldest gnu/linux distro's to which even SuSe has roots.
3. Submitted by Ram Sambamurthy, Thursday 6th July 2006
The reason for my installing ZenWalk was that there was an old machine (500 MHz, Pentium III) in the non-profit org that i volunteer in. While OpenSUSE was slow (maybe because of Gnome) on it, Zenwalk was very fast. I had also tried Ubuntu Dapper on the PC but it gave problems with the screen resolution. It was only able to go 640x480; I didn't like that. However, Zenwalk was perfect and ran without problems. The only problem was mounting the floppy. That was the biggest headache. What do you tell users when they find they cannot see the contents of a floppy? Even the mount devices toolbutton that I activated on the toolbar did not work. I would select the floppy but it would never mount. I had to do a "mount -t msdos blah blah" for the floppy mount to work.
- Submit
- 1 - 3
1. Submitted by snvv, Monday 26th June 2006